Launch Day Copy
Launch copy for 7 platforms in one tap. Drop your product name and one-liner - get ready-to-post copy for Twitter, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Hacker News, Reddit, and email.
Launch copy for 7 platforms in one tap. Drop your product name and one-liner - get ready-to-post copy for Twitter, LinkedIn, Indie Hackers, Product Hunt, Hacker News, Reddit, and email.
Before writing — my thinking:
The core frustration: If you're a fintech or proptech company that wants to offer rent advances to landlords, you currently have to stitch together your own credit scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking verification, and FCA compliance layer. That's months of engineering and legal work before you can deploy a single pound of capital. The founder was probably watching companies try to enter rent factoring and hitting the same wall over and over — not the capital problem, but the infrastructure problem.
The most surprising/specific thing: This isn't a lender. It's the plumbing that lets other companies become rent advance providers using their own capital. That distinction is everything.
Who cares most: UK proptech founders, letting agents exploring embedded finance, and small lenders who want to enter the rent advance space but can't justify building scoring + compliance + collections from scratch.
1. TWITTER / X
Every letting agent in the UK collects rent on the 1st and pays the landlord on the 15th. That 14-day float is a financial product nobody has built proper infrastructure for. Until now.
wectory.com
2. LINKEDIN
Last year I sat in a meeting with a property management company that wanted to offer rent advances to their landlords. They had the capital. They had the demand. They had landlords literally asking for it.
What they didn't have: a way to score tenants for advance eligibility, collect via Direct Debit, verify income through Open Banking, and stay compliant — without spending 8 months and a small fortune building it themselves.
That conversation stuck with me because I kept having it. Different companies, same wall. The bottleneck in UK rent factoring isn't capital or demand. It's infrastructure.
So we built Wectory — B2B rails that let partners plug in scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking verification, and compliance so they can advance rent to landlords using their own funds. No banking licence needed on their side. No 8-month build.
If you're working in UK proptech or property finance, I'd genuinely like to hear whether this matches what you're seeing in the market: wectory.com
3. INDIE HACKERS
Headline: We built B2B infrastructure for rent factoring in the UK
I spent years in property finance and kept watching the same thing: companies with capital and landlord relationships who wanted to offer rent advances but couldn't get past the technical and compliance build. The infrastructure gap was killing deals before they started.
The problem is specific but real — if you want to factor rent in the UK, you need tenant credit scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking income verification, and an FCA-compliant wrapper around all of it. Building that from scratch takes 6-12 months and a dedicated team. Most companies give up or hack something together that doesn't scale.
Wectory is API-first infrastructure that handles all four layers. Partners bring their own capital and landlord relationships. We handle the underwriting logic, money movement, and compliance. Think of it as "Stripe for rent advances" except that analogy is doing a lot of heavy lifting — the regulated finance part makes it meaningfully harder.
Traction: [insert your numbers here — partners onboarded, rent volume processed, pipeline size, whatever you're comfortable sharing]
Honest question for this community: we're selling to a mix of proptech companies and traditional letting agents. The sales cycles are wildly different. Has anyone here built B2B infrastructure that serves both tech-native and non-tech-native buyers? How did you handle the product and go-to-market split?
4. PRODUCT HUNT TAGLINE
Wectory — Rent advance infrastructure for UK partners
5. HACKER NEWS
Title: Show HN: Wectory – B2B API for rent factoring in the UK
Wectory is infrastructure that lets companies advance rent to landlords — we handle tenant scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking verification, and compliance so partners can deploy their own capital without building the stack themselves. I built this after watching multiple proptech companies spend 6-12 months trying to assemble these pieces independently and either shipping something fragile or giving up entirely.
One decision worth mentioning: we chose to run scoring and Open Banking verification as a single pipeline rather than separate steps. Most implementations treat them as sequential gates, but combining them lets us catch cases where a tenant's bank data contradicts their stated income before a scoring decision is even made — reduces false positives meaningfully and cuts the verification flow from minutes to seconds. The trade-off is tighter coupling, which makes the system harder to test, but for regulated finance the data consistency matters more.
Live at wectory.com — happy to answer questions about the technical architecture or the regulatory side.
6. REDDIT
Title: I built rent factoring infrastructure because watching proptech companies rebuild the same thing from scratch was painful
Wectory is B2B plumbing for rent advances in the UK — scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking verification, and compliance, all via API. Partners bring their own capital and landlord relationships, we handle the hard parts underneath.
The specific annoyance: I kept meeting companies that had money to deploy and landlords who wanted early rent payments, but the technical and regulatory build to connect those two things was a 6-12 month project. The same four problems, solved badly from scratch, over and over.
One thing I learned building this: regulated finance infrastructure is roughly 30% building the product and 70% proving to various authorities that you built it correctly. The documentation burden is genuinely wild.
I'd appreciate honest feedback, especially from anyone in UK property or fintech. The thing I'm most unsure about is pricing structure — whether to charge per transaction, per partner, or on volume tiers. If you have opinions on B2B infrastructure pricing I'm all ears.
wectory.com
7. EMAIL
Subject line: The 14-day float nobody has infrastructure for
Hey —
There's a weird gap in UK property finance. Tenants pay rent on the 1st. Landlords often don't see it until the 15th or later. That float is valuable, and a growing number of companies want to advance rent to landlords against it.
The problem is that actually doing this requires tenant scoring, Direct Debit collection, Open Banking verification, and a compliance layer that satisfies the FCA. Building all four from scratch takes most of a year.
Today I'm launching Wectory — B2B infrastructure that handles all of it via API. Partners bring their own capital. We handle everything between "tenant pays rent" and "landlord gets paid early."
If you're working anywhere near this space, I'd love for you to take a look and tell me what you think:
[link]
— [First name]
4h ago
Local shops are paying for 5 different SaaS tools that their customers never open. Meanwhile every one of those customers already has WhatsApp. We replaced the entire stack with one chat thread and a tap-to-review device at the counter.
[link]
Last year I watched a barbershop owner toggle between five browser tabs — one for bookings, one for review requests, one for loyalty stamps, a CRM he barely understood, and WhatsApp where his actual customers were already messaging him.
He was paying for four tools his customers never touched, while the one channel they already lived in — WhatsApp — did nothing for his business.
That image stuck with me. Most local merchants don't need more software. They need less software in the one place their customers already are.
So I built BuzzAgent. It collapses booking, review collection, loyalty, and CRM into a single WhatsApp channel. And we paired it with BuzzPad — a small QR/NFC device that sits at the register and nudges happy customers to leave a Google Review with one tap before they walk out the door.
No app downloads. No new logins. No training manual.
If you work with or run a local business, I'd genuinely love to hear if this matches what you've seen. Link in comments.
I replaced 5 SaaS tabs with one WhatsApp thread for local shops
I spent a few months helping small merchants — barbers, cafes, clinics — with their online presence. Every single one was drowning in fragmented tools they barely used, while their real customer conversations happened on WhatsApp. The disconnect was absurd.
The problem: a local shop owner paying $80-150/month across booking, reviews, loyalty, and CRM platforms — none of which talk to each other, and none of which their customers want to open.
BuzzAgent puts all of that into a single WhatsApp channel. Customers book, get loyalty rewards, and receive follow-ups in the same chat they already use. At the physical location, a BuzzPad (QR/NFC device) sits at the counter and routes satisfied customers straight to Google Reviews with one tap — right at the moment they're happiest.
Traction: [insert your numbers here]
Honest question for this community: the hardware component (BuzzPad) adds friction to onboarding but is the single biggest driver of Google Reviews. Would you lean into it as a differentiator or try to make it optional to reduce friction in the sales process?
BuzzAgent — One WhatsApp channel replaces 5 tools for local shops
Show HN: BuzzAgent – WhatsApp-based CRM/booking/reviews for local merchants
BuzzAgent consolidates booking, loyalty, CRM, and review collection into a single WhatsApp Business API channel for local merchants. I built it after noticing that every small shop I worked with was paying for 4-5 SaaS tools their customers ignored, while all real interactions happened on WhatsApp anyway. The interesting design constraint was the review collection piece — we built a small NFC/QR device (BuzzPad) that sits at the point of sale and deep-links to Google Reviews, because the window where a customer will actually leave a review is about 90 seconds after a good experience, and that window closes the moment they leave. The WhatsApp integration runs on the official Cloud API with structured message templates for bookings and loyalty, so it stays within Meta's policy without feeling spammy. Try it at [link].
Title: I built a thing that replaces 5 SaaS subscriptions with one WhatsApp chat for small local shops
I kept helping local business owners — barbers, dentists, cafe owners — set up their online tools, and the pattern was always the same: they'd sign up for a booking tool, a review platform, a loyalty app, and some CRM, then end up just texting customers on WhatsApp anyway. So I built BuzzAgent, which puts booking, loyalty, review requests, and customer management into a single WhatsApp channel. There's also a physical NFC/QR device (BuzzPad) that sits at the counter to catch Google Reviews while the customer is still smiling.
One thing I learned building this: the hardest part isn't the tech, it's convincing a shop owner that fewer tools is actually better. They've been sold "you need this platform" so many times that simplicity feels suspicious.
I'd really appreciate honest feedback. The thing I'm most unsure about is pricing — I don't know yet whether to charge a flat monthly fee or tie it to usage like number of bookings or reviews collected. What would feel fair to you if you ran a small shop?
Subject: Your customers already have the app
Hey —
Think about the last time you booked a haircut, confirmed a dental appointment, or asked a restaurant about availability. Odds are you did it over WhatsApp.
Now think about what most local shops are actually paying for: a booking tool their customers forget to check, a review platform that sends emails nobody opens, a loyalty app that gets deleted after one visit, and a CRM that collects dust.
The customer's preferred channel is sitting right there. It's already installed on their phone.
BuzzAgent puts booking, reviews, loyalty, and customer follow-ups into one WhatsApp thread — the place your customers already are. And a small tap-to-review device at your counter catches Google Reviews while people are still happy, not three days later when they've forgotten.
Have a look: [link]
— [First name]
4h ago
Every time someone asks me "what prompt do you use for that?" I have to screenshot it, explain the model, walk them through it. Now I just send a link.
Tappble — any prompt, shareable in one click.
[link]
Last month a friend asked me how I was generating thumbnail concepts so fast. I typed out the prompt, told her which model, explained the settings. She got confused. I ended up on a 20-minute call just to walk her through pasting text into a box.
That's when it hit me: we're all building these incredible AI workflows, but sharing them is still absurdly manual. You can't just hand someone a prompt the way you'd hand them a Google Doc link.
So I built Tappble. You take any prompt, turn it into a shareable link. The person who clicks it gets an instant result — no account, no app, no "which model do I pick." One click, done.
If you've ever caught yourself screenshotting ChatGPT instructions for a coworker, this is what I made it for.
Try it today: [link]
I got tired of explaining my prompts over text, so I made them clickable
I kept running into the same situation: someone sees an output from one of my AI prompts, asks how I did it, and then I spend 15 minutes walking them through copy-pasting and model selection. It felt like sending someone a recipe by reading it aloud over the phone.
The problem is simple — prompts are useful, but they're trapped in your clipboard. There's no native way to share a working prompt the way you share a Notion page or a Figma link.
Tappble turns any prompt into a shareable URL. Click the link, get the result. No login, no app install, no explaining which model to use. The person on the other end just sees it work.
Traction: [insert your numbers here]
Honest question for the community: do you see this more as a utility for individuals sharing prompts casually, or as something teams would use internally for repeatable workflows? I'm genuinely torn on which direction to push first.
Tappble — Turn any AI prompt into a shareable link
Show HN: Tappble – Turn AI prompts into shareable, one-click links
Tappble lets you wrap any prompt into a URL that produces an instant result when someone clicks it — no app, no auth required on the recipient's end. I built it because I kept manually walking people through prompt setups, and it felt like a problem that should have been solved already by URL. The main design decision was treating the prompt link as a stateless, ephemeral execution rather than persisting sessions or requiring accounts — I wanted the click-to-result latency to feel closer to opening a webpage than launching a tool, which meant handling model routing and rendering server-side. Curious if others have run into the same friction around prompt sharing. Try it here: [link]
I built a tool that turns AI prompts into shareable links because I was tired of being unpaid tech support for my friends
Every time someone asked "how did you make that," I'd end up in a 15-minute back-and-forth explaining which model, what settings, where to paste what. So I built Tappble — you take a prompt, generate a link, and whoever clicks it gets the result immediately. No app, no account, nothing to configure.
The thing I didn't expect while building it: the hardest part wasn't the tech, it was deciding how much control to give the link creator vs. keeping it dead simple for the person clicking. I'm still not sure I got that balance right.
Would love honest feedback — especially if you try it and the value isn't immediately obvious. That's the kind of thing I need to hear. [link]
Subject: I turned a 15-minute explanation into a link
Hey —
You know that thing where someone sees something you made with AI and asks how you did it? And then you're screenshotting prompts, explaining model settings, and basically giving a tutorial you didn't sign up for?
I kept doing that. Over and over. For friends, coworkers, random people in group chats.
So I built something small. You take any prompt, turn it into a link. Whoever clicks it gets the result instantly — no app, no account, no instructions needed.
It's called Tappble, and it's live today.
If you've ever wished you could just hand someone a working prompt the way you hand them a Google Doc, give it a try:
[link]
Let me know what you think — genuinely want to hear if this clicks for you or not.
— [First name]
5h ago